The PRSA board, meeting today in Jacksonville, Fla., hometown
of president Del Galloway, should vote to bar any officers
and directors from putting any heat on the nominating committee
this year.
Last year's nomcom was battered by officers and booted off
three of PRSA's best leaders.
The boil that was last year's nominating committee burst
in many ways.
First, the Board of Ethics and Professional Standards twice
pleaded with the national board to investigate alleged wrongdoing
by the nomcom and twice it was turned down. The top two people
on BEPS were dispatched-Chuck Wood and Vivian Hamilton.
Sherry Treco-Jones, working many hours with other board members,
then proposed reforms of the nomcom. These were shot down
in a close 8-6 vote of the national board in March.
The defeat of this motion is proof that board members and
officers should not be involved in backing or denigrating
candidates.
Three of the candidates backed by 2003 president Reed Byrum
and 2004 president Del Galloway got nominated and elected-Sue
Bohle, Michael Cherenson and Anthony D'Angelo. Not surprisingly,
they voted with their benefactors on the nomcom reform issue,
defeating it.
The next day, Sherry Treco-Jones, who headed the fight for
nomcom reform, resigned from the board, becoming the first
board member ever to resign mid-term from PRSA.
And who replaced Treco-Jones? Gary McCormick, one of those
picked for the board by the nomcom but who was defeated by
Rosanna Fiske.
We wonder if Treco-Jones got a slight push.
Anthony Franco resigned the presidency in 1986 but he was
actually forced out because he had signed an SEC consent decree,
a huge embarrassment to PRSA. He had failed to tell PRSA of
this impending action.
Board, Officers
Have Weight
PRSA is contending that the 2000 Jack Felton committee on
nomcom reform urged "all" members to take part in the nominating
process. But Felton also said that the board should not be
involved in picking its own members.
If the Felton committee wanted officers to be involved in
the nomcom process, it would have specifically said "officers
and directors."
Officers and directors can have influence over the nomcom
because they can do many favors for people including appointing
them to head committees and task forces.
Exhibit "A" for this is the three new board members who went
along with their benefactors.
Had Jeff Seideman, Art Stevens and Phil Ryan still been on
the board, the nomcom reforms and criticism of the 2003 nomcom
would haved passed.
What were the abuses of the 2003 nomcom, headed by Kathy
Lewton?
At the last minute, according to sources, Byrum and Galloway
sent e-mails to the nomcom arguing against the selection of
Seideman, Stevens and Ryan.
This was after Byrum and Galloway had agreed with a board
vote that no one on the board was to get involved in the nominating
process.
The nomcom, disobeying rules set up by the Felton committee,
did not keep track of all contacts with nomcom members. This
would have shown the contacts by Galloway and Byrum.
Lewton also made recommendations to the members on her committee
although she is supposed to be neutral, sources said.
Neither Lewton, Byrum or Galloway have denied these reports.
We would like all of them to testify under oath.
Galloway, incidentally, has been unavailable for quoting
in recent weeks. He must again take up the reins of leadership
or forfeit his presidency. He should make a strong statement
against board participation in the 2004 nominations.
A corporate candidate, employed by a client of Lewton's firm,
Fleishman-Hillard, was sought for the board even though he
had none of the required technical qualifications. He was
even nominated.
But the nomination was then withdrawn. Why didn't PRSA staff
examine his qualifications?
The single deadline date allowed for nominations was pushed
back six days. This was illegal, say critics but the nomcom
does not agree.
Felton Rapped
"Elite" Few
Jack Felton, 1987 president who worked many months on nomcom
reform (after 1980 president Patrick Jackson was accused of
having too much influence on candidates), told the 2000 Assembly
that PRSA was "tired of this elitist approach."
The nine directors who that year supported Joann Killeen
over Stevens for president-elect had formed a "conspiracy"
to "elect their own candidates," said Felton, "in order to
keep their own little elite group in power."
The Society's bylaws say board and officer selection is to
be by the "nominating committee which represents all chapters
and districts... the intent is to have the board separate
from the nominating process and the board is not to elect
its own officers," he further said.
Under the Felton committee's reforms, the nominating committee
was expanded from ten to 20 people.
|